Sounds like the science of ankle joint arthroplasty is starting to heat up a bit. Ankle joint arthroplasty? What’s that? Arthroplasty means to remodel. And in most cases, we’re talking about post traumatic arthritis or osteoarthritis.
So what’s new? Well, for years, the gold standard has been ankle fusion. And that’s the procedure that old guys like me (twenty five years in practice) still use on a regular basis. From the standpoint of outcomes, I tend to find that ankle fusion has a good, functional outcome. For most folks, when walking, you don’t even have a perceptible limp post fusion.
One new technique is called arthrodiastasis. Arthrodiastasis involves the application of an ankle distractor. The distractor is placed with two pins in the foot and one in the leg. Then the pins in the foot and leg are separated to ‘off-load’ the ankle. The idea here is that the ankle will be able to return to a normal joint and regenerate cartilage. Problems with arthrodiastasis include surgery (pins in the leg), pin tract infections and a bit of a ‘keep your fingers crossed’ approach to the ankle. Most studies describe a 2-5 month need for the ankle distractor and non-weight bearing. Long terms results on arthrodiastasis are pending.
Daniel Lee, DPM just came out with a novel a procedure in the Sept/Oct ‘08 J of Foot and Ankle Surgery (47:5, 2008). Lee describes a technique where he employs arthrodiastasis in conjunction with the use of Graft Jacket. Graft Jacket is used as a fibrous scaffold for cartilaginous in-growth. Again, long term studies are pending.
And ankle implants? That’s another hot topic. What’s my choice? I still haven’t warmed up to the use of ankle implants. Many of the cases that I see involve patients who are not happy with their ankle implants. I’m sure there are many who have had success. But for now, I’m sticking to ankle fusion.
Jeff
Jeffrey A. Oster, DPM
Medical Director
Myfootshop.com
The Foot Talk Forum